Taking Stock Of Gold Stocks – ANV, NGD, AUY, FCX, NEM, AEX, GDX

Submitted by Michael Noonan – Edge Trader Plus

Sunday  16 February 2014

[Note:  This started as a comparative look at some gold stocks, and it turned into a great
exercise in finding trades, if you take the time and go through the steps we outline in each
chart.  You can begin to see differences in the quality of  trade selection, based purely on
information the market offers each and every day.  Enjoy!]

We often see comments to the effect of interest in gold miner stocks as a play on gold.  Ten
days ago, we did an analysis of silver-related stocks, Taking Stock of Silver Stocks, looking
at SLW, PAAS, CDE, AG, SSRI, and HL.   While many view mining companies as a proxy
for gold, they are not necessarily so.  There are many influences that can affect the
performance of a mining stock that are unrelated to the performance of the underlying
physical: management, cost of mining, depletion, labor issues, added debt, etc.

What we know about charts is that they do not lie and most accurately depict conditions
and character for each time frame and for any given stock or futures activity.   You can
actually see how markets develop into trading opportunities, as well as when to avoid
committing money.  Charts capture the essence of timing so lacking in fundamentals.

What is important to understand is that you do not need to be a “technical analyst” to
understand how to read a chart.  Markets are full of logic.  One needs to exercise some
patience and follow the logic, as explained, and you will have a greater sense of what to
expect in any given situation and at any given point in time.  When things are not always
clear, that, too, is a message from the market to leave well enough alone, and look for
other, clearer opportunities.

Is that not a worthwhile objective to manage risk and increase positive results?

You always want to look for a “story” where the developing market activity is providing
information on how, [long or short], and when to enter, and at what price.  There are a
few stories in some of the charts that may help you better understand.

As a point of clarification, we do not trade in any of these stocks.  This is a hindsight
analysis, if you will, using the same techniques we apply in our Recommendations
section.  What each chart analysis captures are the principles we employ and the rules
used in execution, based on developing market activity, or repeating patterns.

The kinds of patterns we identify appear over and over in the markets.  It then becomes
a “simple” matter of searching for the same pattern behavior moving forward.  It is
called having an “edge,” the expectation of a favorable outcome based upon past history.
As in life, in the markets, history [patterns] repeats, not always exactly, but the pattens
rhyme very closely.

The current weekly and daily gold charts will be posted first, to use as a reference relative
to where the following gold stocks are as of last week.  They are from our gold article of a
few days ago, Bankers Can [Will] Steal Your Cash.  The charts are presented in no
particular order, but the order in which they developed were interesting in progression.

Weekly for reference:

GC W 15 Feb 14

Daily for reference:

GC D 15 Feb 14

We always start with weekly charts to identify the primary trend and then be able  to put
the daily chart into a relative context.  Higher time frames are more controlling over
lower time frames.

The sharp volume spikes were obvious, but we did not know what to make of them
throughout a developing TR. [Trading Range]

AND W 16 Feb 14

An apparent potential breakout was developing at the beginning of January.  The chart
comments explain the entry.  You can see the correction in late January held the initial
breakout area very well, and that augured for higher prices to come, and price did move

Last Friday was another breakout day to buy on the opening.  We did not draw lines to
show the TR since the early January breakout, but once you add them, you will see how
the two breakouts were similar, leaving a TR.  Patterns repeat.

ANV D 16 Feb 14

Breaking a TL, [Trend Line], is not that significant of an event.  Of greater importance are
previous swing highs/lows and high volume, wide range bars.  The TL has been broken,
but NGD has some overhead resistance with which it must overcome.  Compared to ANV,
NGD is a relatively stronger chart.

Whenever you have a choice of which stock to buy, always buy the stronger performer.  It
has proven that from its relative strength, it will likely perform better than others.

NGD W 16 Feb 14

There is a breakout on the daily chart, from Friday, but when you look at the weekly chart
and see potential overhead resistance, the upside may be limited.

You can also see how NGD labored in its initial January breakout, relative to ANV.

NGD D 16 Feb 14

What stands out on the weekly AUY is the gap lower when price broke a previous support
area from May ’12.  A horizontal line is drawn from the low prior to the gap day.  It will act
as future resistance.

The next two rally attempts failed to close the gap area.  This left a space which is what is
referred to as bearish spacing.  It occurs when the next rally after a swing low fails to reach
the swing low price.  What this tells you is that sellers were confident enough in expecting
lower prices that they did not need to see how the last swing low would hold on a retest.

AUY has these issues and may not be the strongest buy candidate.  The daily chart may
show something different.

AUY W 16 Feb 14

The explanations for each chart is a way of explaining a “story” behind each chart and its
developing market activity.  We just qualified how the weekly AUY could have issues.  The
daily chart presented a situation that provided a low risk entry with greater potential profit
in the trade shown below.

Here is the “story.”  When you see correction from the January high to the early February
low, it forms a downsloping pennant.  If it looks like price could breakout to the upside,
there is a great trading opportunity.

When you look at the February low, you see how it stopped at 1. the January opening gap,
and 2. the supportive TR that followed the gap.  The decline in February, stopping at an
obvious support could lead to a rally.  The bar after the February low rallied on increased
volume, which means increased buying.  If price can rally higher next day, you can place a
buy stop above the top pennant line and buy what should be a breakout.

Let us assume you placed a buy stop at 9.30 or 9.40.  Price closed strongly that day, and it
continued to over $10, as of Friday.  Forgetting the potential for AUY to continue higher,
what counts is how you can use past market activity as a guide that helps present a greater
probability of market direction as events develop into a defined pattern, as just described.

The initial protective sell stop would have been around 8.70.  It could now be moved to
9.70, providing a risk free trade.  There was no guesswork or need to “predict” anything.
The market advertised the situation as it developed, and you will see situations like this
occurring frequently.

AUY D 16 Feb 14

FCX is in a TR, and compared to a few other companies below, you can better understand
why this would not be a good candidate for a buy.  Why not?  You want to be buying those
stocks that have already proven strength by moving higher.    FCX failed in two attempts
against proven supply, noted by the December ’12 high volume, wide range bar lower.

S/D means Supply overcame Demand, and that price level will be defended by those who
sold in order to protect their profits.   The two failed rallies in October and December ’12
are a testament to that pattern.  Note the very small range of the last weekly bar in
December.  The reason why it is so small is because sellers were much stronger than the
buyers, preventing buyers from staging any kind of rally.  It is a point of resistance.

FCX W 16 Feb 14

The rectangle shows the small range bar from the weekly chart.  You can see how volume
was weak, a lack of demand, and sellers stepped up and took control.  We said of the
weekly bar that it was resistance.  Look at the mid-January retest of that failed swing high.
Not only did price stop at that level, new aggressive selling entered the market, noted by
in sharp increase in volume, adding to that price level as future resistance.

When you understand that past support, once broken, become future resistance, you can
see why FCX stopped at 34, Friday.  Volume declined, again, indicating a lack of demand.
That could change by Monday, but for now, until increased demand shows up, FCX is not
the best buy candidate.

Worth pointing out is the fact that there are people who are buying these lesser performing
stocks.  Why?  They are not reading the charts, for one, and they do not understand the
concept of relative strength, as you now do, and hopefully, you are beginning to make
better buy decisions.

We did mention there is a high degree of logic to be found in market activity, as shown in
the charts.

FCX D 16 Feb 14

The KISS principle at work.

NEM W 16 Feb 14

After reviewing the previous charts, do you see any reason to buy NEM?

You will note that we are using only the stock symbols and not the names.  Sometimes,
stocks have greater name recognition.  We do not care.  We are only interested in the
stock’s price recognition, relative to others within the same category.

NEM D 16 Feb 14

One should exercise a little more caution in new situations with little price history, and
AEX is included precisely for that reason.  Brief as its price history is, there is already a
red flag bar at the rally high.  Volume increased, but price closed at the low of the range,
letting you know sellers were stronger than buyers.

See how the market is “giving” you specific information?  Knowing that, would you want to
be a buyer of AEX?

AEX W 16 Feb 14

The “story” comes from the weekly, just covered.  With a poor close, one can expect a sell
off to occur, or at least the probability of a sell off is much greater than a rally.  You want
to find those situations which tell you that the “probability” of a directional market move
is greater in one direction than the other.  this is what will give you an edge in decision

5GDX W 16 Feb 14

For as negative as the weekly chart appears, there was actually a low risk, greater reward
probability situation that developed when GDX stayed in a TR for the last half of January
into early February.  Take a look and see if you can spot a few reasons why this was a
reasonable short-term buy candidate.  You will get some answers in the next paragraph,
but you want to learn to look for your own “story” developing.

TRs lead to breakouts.  In the middle of January, there was a gap up in price, just under
23.  For the next six TDs, price moved sideways and held the gap up, indicating support.
From the end of January though the first part of February, the bottoms of the day ranges
stayed above the support line.

Note how volume declined just prior to the upside breakout.  The declining volume told
you that there was no selling pressure at the February low.  It was followed by a relatively
strong rally and high-end close bar, just under resistance at 24.  A buy stop just above 24
made sense, just as a buy stop on the AUY daily chart was a strategic move.  The risk was
a stop just under 23!

Price gapped higher next day.  A buy stop automatically put you in the trade, and price
rallied, as the probability of recent developing market activity revealed.

Each situation is unique in how the future will unfold, something you cannot know in
advance.  By trading relative strength stocks and using recognized pattern situations that
have a “story” behind them, the probability of you trading/investing successfully have
increased in your favor dramatically.

Now you are trading with an edge.  There is no reason to ever do otherwise.

GDX D 16 Feb 14


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *